<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dropbox vs SugarSync</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/</link>
	<description>Deconstructing technology, one piece at a time...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McClure</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7907</guid>
		<description>I would appreciate keeping the affiliate links to a minimum, as I told the commenter just before you. If you feel you must post the link, that&#039;s fine, but please then make the rest of the comment at least useful, informative, or directly related to the article content in the future.


Thank you! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would appreciate keeping the affiliate links to a minimum, as I told the commenter just before you. If you feel you must post the link, that&#8217;s fine, but please then make the rest of the comment at least useful, informative, or directly related to the article content in the future.</p>
<p>Thank you! <img src='http://technologykills.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7906</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7906</guid>
		<description>A handy tip for signing up to DropBox… If you want some extra storage from the start
use my referral link to sign up

http://goo.gl/StEow

Both Dropbox users ( you and I) get an extra 250MB on top of the free 2GB.

Once Joined you can then refer others and receive an extra 250MB per referral up to a max of 8Gig… Free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A handy tip for signing up to DropBox… If you want some extra storage from the start<br />
use my referral link to sign up</p>
<p><a href="http://goo.gl/StEow" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/StEow</a></p>
<p>Both Dropbox users ( you and I) get an extra 250MB on top of the free 2GB.</p>
<p>Once Joined you can then refer others and receive an extra 250MB per referral up to a max of 8Gig… Free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McClure</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7898</guid>
		<description>@223074417ff1850108a1856b2aaec0fc:disqus : I would appreciate if you could keep the affiliate links to a mimumim--at least make your comments more relevant if you do still feel the need to post affiliate links. It&#039;s not that your comment isn&#039;t at all relevant, but that I feel the reason it was posted is to provide your links, rather than provide useful content for other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@223074417ff1850108a1856b2aaec0fc:disqus : I would appreciate if you could keep the affiliate links to a mimumim&#8211;at least make your comments more relevant if you do still feel the need to post affiliate links. It&#8217;s not that your comment isn&#8217;t at all relevant, but that I feel the reason it was posted is to provide your links, rather than provide useful content for other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankla</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7896</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7896</guid>
		<description>I’ve been using SugarSync and sugarsync  for about a year now and I’m really satisfied. Very little system load compared to other similar products I’ve tried and has never once crashed.

If you sign up via my referral link below we both get an extra 500 MB if you sign up for a free account or 10 GB if you sign up for a 30 GB account or larger:

 http://goo.gl/JEN9Z

or dropbox 

http://db.tt/7UuDW32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been using SugarSync and sugarsync  for about a year now and I’m really satisfied. Very little system load compared to other similar products I’ve tried and has never once crashed.</p>
<p>If you sign up via my referral link below we both get an extra 500 MB if you sign up for a free account or 10 GB if you sign up for a 30 GB account or larger:</p>
<p> http://goo.gl/JEN9Z</p>
<p>or dropbox </p>
<p><a href="http://db.tt/7UuDW32" rel="nofollow">http://db.tt/7UuDW32</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McClure</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7889</guid>
		<description>While your comments are appreciated, continued advertising in them will result in them being marked as Spam.

To the first half of your comment at least, I am torn: While I much prefer the flexibility and features of SugarSync, the problems it&#039;s caused me has made me lean toward the simplicity and reliability of Dropbox.

None-the-less, I am quite happy now with SpiderOak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your comments are appreciated, continued advertising in them will result in them being marked as Spam.</p>
<p>To the first half of your comment at least, I am torn: While I much prefer the flexibility and features of SugarSync, the problems it&#8217;s caused me has made me lean toward the simplicity and reliability of Dropbox.</p>
<p>None-the-less, I am quite happy now with SpiderOak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>I definitely prefer Sugarsync to Dropbox, way more features and 5GB free as standard rather than 2Gb

Get an extra 500MB here at the link below, so you will have 5.5GB to start with. I also get 500MB if you signup using this link, thanks in advance!

https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=c9n6dgjqihyri&amp;utm_source=txemail&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=referral</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely prefer Sugarsync to Dropbox, way more features and 5GB free as standard rather than 2Gb</p>
<p>Get an extra 500MB here at the link below, so you will have 5.5GB to start with. I also get 500MB if you signup using this link, thanks in advance!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=c9n6dgjqihyri&#038;utm_source=txemail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=referral" rel="nofollow">https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=c9n6dgjqihyri&#038;utm_source=txemail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=referral</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7866</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7866</guid>
		<description>Sugarsync has recently upgraded their free accounts to include 5.5.GB of free and secure online storage, not bad at all!: https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=ejjfpyq3n6nmz    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sugarsync has recently upgraded their free accounts to include 5.5.GB of free and secure online storage, not bad at all!: <a href="https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=ejjfpyq3n6nmz" rel="nofollow">https://www.sugarsync.com/referral?rf=ejjfpyq3n6nmz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fertility Drugs</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7861</link>
		<dc:creator>Fertility Drugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7861</guid>
		<description>SugarSync: This service the potential to be a nice alternative to Dropbox. For starters, its free model gives you 5 GB versus Dropbox&#039;s 2 GB. For $99 you can get 60 GB of storage while Dropbox only gives you 50 GB for the same amount. ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SugarSync: This service the potential to be a nice alternative to Dropbox. For starters, its free model gives you 5 GB versus Dropbox&#8217;s 2 GB. For $99 you can get 60 GB of storage while Dropbox only gives you 50 GB for the same amount. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McClure</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>That is my understanding of their development methodology as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that may be part of the issue with SugarSync as I have found out--I praised their fast-moving development cycle, but that can also introduce bugs and unexpected behavior and interactions that were not planned for. If they are not found and fixed immediately they can be very hard to track down later on (especially if the code happens to be poorly documented).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even though it&#039;s less exciting, Dropbox seems to be a service that people can rely on, and that scores it huge points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is my understanding of their development methodology as well.</p>
<p>I believe that may be part of the issue with SugarSync as I have found out&#8211;I praised their fast-moving development cycle, but that can also introduce bugs and unexpected behavior and interactions that were not planned for. If they are not found and fixed immediately they can be very hard to track down later on (especially if the code happens to be poorly documented).</p>
<p>Even though it&#39;s less exciting, Dropbox seems to be a service that people can rely on, and that scores it huge points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyagerfan5761</title>
		<link>http://technologykills.com/2010/02/23/dropbox-vs-sugarsync/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyagerfan5761</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologykills.com/?p=111#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it. I&#039;ll try to remember to check back when they release the&lt;br&gt;features.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#039;re probably following the principle of not releasing anything&lt;br&gt;half-baked, like Apple does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it. I&#39;ll try to remember to check back when they release the<br />features.</p>
<p>They&#39;re probably following the principle of not releasing anything<br />half-baked, like Apple does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 446/489 objects using disk: basic

Served from: technologykills.com @ 2012-02-08 01:04:30 -->
